No One Knows What It Is, But In-House Counsel Desperately Need It
In-house counsel don't need to understand AI to know it's importance.
In-house counsel don't need to understand AI to know it's importance.
Being corporate counsel is a more coveted position than in dinosaur days -- and with good reason.
Think about these things as you apply for an in-house job; they may spare you a couple of years of misery.
In-house lawyers are responding to today's challenges in interesting ways -- and earning more money, too.
Two important clarifications from Judge Posner about his controversial remarks.
Wise advice from a panel of top general counsel.
As the use of artificial intelligence permeates legal practice, a critical question confronts every legal professional who uses these tools: Can I trust this?
Discovery doesn't have to suck (well, at least as much as it so often does).
It's hard out here for an employment lawyer.
The gains from working more closely with these colleagues should not be ignored out of inertia or fear.
It's all about OPM: "Other People's Money."
Legal teams ask a practical question. If large language models are so capable, why does legal AI still depend on curated content, and why does surfacing that content matter so much?
This is why in-house lawyers balk at paying for first- and second-year associates.
Advice for lawyers who are new to the top in-house job.
Litigation finance is on the rise, so now's a good time to educate yourself.
How should in-house lawyers and corporate boards approach these critical concerns?
Advice for in-house counsel on how to handle some of the most important events in a company's existence.